INSTRUMENTATION
We are the key to an issue free startup, and we know this because we have done it many times before!
Commissioning? We got it!
Maintenance and troubleshooting? That too!
Means you asked, there's not a lot we can't handle.
We wanted to change the way the industry currently sees an Instrument and Controls Technician. A few years back we set out to create something that gave clients more bang for their buck than the typical I&C Tech who took work orders on a daily basis and attempted to complete them. In a plant where there are clear, concise instructions, and documentation is nothing less than perfect, a Technician is all you need. But what if your facility has suffered from years of neglect. Neglect in the form of employees not following through with updating critical documentation such as P&ID’s, Loop Drawings, Spec Sheets, Motor Control Schematics, etc.? There is likely a misconception in most facilities that these documents are up-to-date and accurate because no one hears otherwise from their employees, but in reality, many employees have the mindset that if they found it that way, it’s not their job to correct it. You will occasionally get an employee that doesn’t cave to peer pressure, feels they can make a difference, and goes the extra mile to get everything corrected and updated, but that’s not the norm, so we gave our I&C Techs some new skills and renamed them Specialists.
So what type of work has some of our I&C Specialists done for clients?
Our I&C Specialist are trained to do numerous things that the typical I&C Tech doesn’t, or even can’t do. Our I&C Specialists have performed the following functions for our clients:
Developed Scope
- Reviewed DCS alarm logs in an effort to evaluate the criticality of the alarms while prioritizing them, as well as determining a path forward for corrective action for each system and component level alarm.
- Reviewed instrumentation to determine whether the installation and condition of the instrumentation could lead to an unexpected unit upset or trip, and developed plans to replace such identified instrumentation.
- Reviewed plant tank gauging system for potential points of failures and developed corrective action plans.
- Reviewed plant Fieldbus infrastructure for potential failures and developed a corrective action plan.
- Developed scope for Preventative Maintenance cycles on various units and equipment which included defining the type of work to be performed, specifying parts, ordering parts, building a package for all items defined in the scope, and providing documentation for commissioning and QC of items worked.
- Reviewed warehouse stock versus field installations, as well as narrowed down the individual instrument models being used onsite, which resulted in adjusting ordering practices to ensure parts were available in the event of an instrument failure preventing both an overwhelming amount of stock, and limiting the down time due to a lack of replacement parts.
Planned Work
- Performed a detailed walk down of Instrumentation and Electrical on equipment and/or areas of upcoming turnarounds, developed a list of items requiring removal for other crafts, items requiring periodical check-outs, and items needing repair or replacement.
- Turned developed work lists/scopes into packages with work details that included loop checkout sheets, spec sheets, loop drawings, electrical schematics, P&ID’s for Positive Component Identification, identifying photos, location of parts, and work-in-progress logs as well as time-lines for performance of this work.
- Interfaced with vendors to order parts as well as developed MOC’s for obsolete parts.
Performed Critical Troubleshooting
- Performed work on SIS or IPF systems which included retrieving all paper work (procedures, data retention forms, inspection forms, logic drawings, P&ID’s, written mitigation plan, etc.) required to perform the job prior to starting, reviewing compliance procedures for mistakes prior to beginning work, understanding the procedure in its entirety, performing a pre-job brief with Operations, ensuring a mitigation plan is in place while the system is bypassed, performing the work without an unintended unit upset or trip, repairing failed instrumentation, returning the system from bypass to normal, and completing all regulatory paperwork required by the site and government agencies.
- Performed work on complex loops which included identifying such instrumentation prior to performing work, retrieving documentation (complex loop write-ups, P&ID’s, Spec Sheets, Loop Drawings, copy of control drawing, etc.), performing a pre-job brief with Operations to ensure no unit trip or upset would occur, repairing the critical instrumentation, and returning it to service.
- Identified numerous installations that were installed incorrectly in a manner that may have prevented the instrumentation from functioning correctly, and possibly resulting in a catastrophic failure.
- Identified and corrected numerous engineering errors that resulted in instrumentation never working since its original installation, or working in a manner in which was unreliable.
Procedure Writing
- Have written procedures for the implementation of MOC’s.
- Have written procedures for jobs with critical steps.
- Have written procedures for work processes that focus on Human Performance and mistake free work.
- Have written procedures for complex commissioning on items such as motor controls that may include numerous interlocks with either protective relays and/or the control system.
QC
- Ensuring installations per industry standards as well as local and national code.
- Create QC documentation for clients when needed.
- All employees are trained in good documentation practices.
- Ensure client’s design and engineering practices are followed.
Proficient with numerous software used in the industry.
- Intools-Creating new loops and tags in the database, as well as creating spec sheets.
- KMS-Creating MOCs, attaching documentation and creating action items for the purposes of following through with items that require following Management of Change from inception, through implementation, to the pre-startup-safety-review, and all the way through being placed in service.
- Electronic Data Management Systems-Locating documentation for the purposes of troubleshooting, scope building, etc.
- SAP and/or Passport-Creating notifications for creating work orders and history, planning Work Orders (adding operations, manpower, costs, ordering parts, creating requisitions for purchasing, etc.), maintaining warehouse stock by ensuring stock is reflective of field requirements, using historical data to identify bad actors, etc.
- Microsoft Office-Excel for commonly used forms like FCO’s, temporary databases, and/or tracking, etc.
- Databases that included policies, procedures and SDS’s (formerly MSDS).
- AutoCAD-For updating P&ID’s and other CAD documents.
- Adobe Pro-For use in creating notes or redlines on documents used in work packages.
- AMS and/or PRM-Asset Management programs used for commissioning and calibration of instrumentation along with other manufacturer plug-ins.
Management of Change
- Using the MOC process for replacement of obsolete instrumentation which requires spec’ing out an appropriate replacement that will meet the approval of Process Control Engineering, Process Engineering, Material Inspectors, and the Environmental groups.
- Using the MOC process for further engineering modifications to correct incorrect installations and/or incorrect applications.
- Starting with an idea, building a conceptual draft for approval by the MOC committee prior to building a full package, which includes selecting the correct application, developing engineering drawings for installation, developing a scope of work for the constructors, soliciting bids from vendors and contractors, and following through with the installation through commissioning all the way up to placing the new designs in service.
- Design from conception to implementation of installations that range from updated and upgraded instrumentation to entirely new designs, along with creation of correlating documentation that often includes P&ID’s, Loop Drawings, Electrical Schematics, Spec Sheets, etc.
Commissioning of New Instrumentation and Electrical Systems from one of our I&C Manager’s perspective.
One of the most important parts of a project is the commissioning phase, no, wait let me rephrase that….the most important part of a project, is the commissioning phase. It’s no secret, that there are a lot of so called craftsmen out there that are really not the best at what they do. I have intimate knowledge of this, both from the prospective of the client, as well as from the prospective of a hiring manager.
After being offered a long term contract position with a client in Illinois, they asked me if it was possible to find I&C Techs that were able to perform at a high level, as the contractors that were currently onsite were not living up to the expectations of the client. In 2001, I decided to take the opportunity to try and find the Techs that met the client’s expectations, but that proved harder than I thought it would be.
The test I created, consisted of nothing more than what I thought a seasoned I&C Tech should know. The problem with that assumption was that the seasoned I&C Techs I interviewed and tested, didn’t have the baseline knowledge I knew it took to be a successful troubleshooter. It took a lot of time and effort, but eventually there was a candidate here and there that passed the test, and we were finally able to put together a team. The before and after results were night and day.
At that point, we also realized why so many projects had problems with start-ups and units often struggled to stay running. The quality of work needed for a successful first run could not be done by most contractors.
So you want to know what the difference is, right? Well, here’s the difference. Let’s talk about how a project is generally managed.
First, scope is developed either by the client or the designated Engineering contractor. Then it is put out for bid, where companies will attempt to be awarded contracts for this work often based on the lowest bid. The bids are then awarded, and shortly after kick-off meetings, construction is started. There are two avenues to take at this point. Avenue A is the contractor constructs, inspects, and commissions their own work and then turns over the completed project to the clients.
Avenue B would consist of the contractor performing their work under the watchful eye of the client, or the client’s designated representative. The eventual turnover and commissioning of the systems would be handled one of two ways. The client and/or their reps would direct the commissioning to ensure that the equipment is checked out in a manner that proves the functionality of the equipment, or the client and/or client reps would perform the commissioning of the equipment themselves.
Why am I suggesting you take Avenue B? Because the last thing you want to do, is think that you’re about to have a successful start-up, only to find out that the start-up will be hit with numerous delays.
How do I know that will happen? Because I’ve seen it over and over, and remember, I’ve tested and interviewed a lot of people in the I&C trade over the last 18 years, so I know who is out there and what they are capable of. The bottom line is this, the contractor who you hired to do the construction and commissioning may really be doing their best. They really may be trying to give you a good product. Their Electricians and Technicians may be doing everything they believe to be right, and if there is a good QC guy on the job, he/she is going to tug on wires in the junction box, he/she is going to make sure there’s a low point drain in the conduit and that there is sufficient slope in a transmitter’s process tubing, etc., but it’s very unlikely he will recognize a design issue.
On large scale jobs, your going to end up with people commissioning that know little more than how to simulate a signal to the DCS. This same individual is not going to look at a spec sheet for a DP level transmitter and think about whether the range on the sheet makes sense, or not, before he/she simulates the signal to the board.
You would be surprised how many installations we find with the wrong ranges, and there’s a simple reason for it. The designer came up with a range based on where the transmitter would be mounted and the technician is verifying that range is configured into the transmitter, but what no one paid attention to is that the transmitter isn’t mounted exactly where it was originally intended to be. It was mounted slightly lower, and to the left, because there was a handrail where it was originally supposed to be mounted. No one catches this, and on the day of start-up you get a deviation alarm because this little error caused your trip transmitter to be off by a few percent, and because it’s a trip transmitter, everything is on hold. Now you’ll send a tech to look at the transmitter, and surprise, they find it calibrated perfectly. No issues is what they report back to Operations and that’s because they found no issues. The range is right, and the calibration is correct to most techs. Now what?
Remember this number I’m about to tell you. More than ninety-five percent of the I&C Techs I’ve tested since 2001 could not calculate a simple DP level transmitter range. This is simple instrumentation, and now it’s costing you money because you can’t start-up. How many more things like this are waiting to be found on start-up? Did the tech who went and simulated the signal on the magnetic flow meter recognize that the flow tube was installed with the electrodes vertical instead of horizontal? If not, you’re shutting down this new equipment to isolate it, drain it, and rotate the meter. There are so many reasons why not to take Avenue A.
Our I&C Specialists find things like this all the time, because it’s part of their everyday job. They find things like this because we talk about them daily. They find things like this because we test their knowledge on just about every facet of Instrumentation.
On our last project, the amount of design and installation issues our team identified would outright shock you if we showed you our tracking database.